NHacker Next
- new
- past
- show
- ask
- show
- jobs
- submit
login
Rendered at 18:38:23 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
This hasn't been the case for at least five years surely?
I also think that behaviour kind of came from youtube. For videos it makes a tiny bit more sense to ignore what the person wanted. For google search it makes no sense, and this is one of many more reasons why I think Google must be disbanded.
I disable the AI spam by Google, but even doing so still does not help uncripple what Google ruined here. Google search is next to useless now - and that was a deliberate change by Google. Oddly enough, the alternative search engines also suck, so I don't blame Google for everything - just the majority part of suckage here.
We need a new search engine. Google failed us here. AdCompanies always fail. Google committed to an ads only company.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadtbibliothek_am_Mail%C3%A4n...
European Central Bank Climate, Nature and Monetary Policy 1 day ago — ECB research has found that four years after a drought or flood, regional output remains depressed by around 3 percentage points on average
(compared to e.g. https://www.google.com/search?q=climate+policy+ecb) which has the same result but does not show the "around 3 percentage points" snippet
> That layer has largely dissolved. Search engines replaced the card catalog, algorithms replaced the reference interview, and AI summaries are now stepping in where a librarian’s judgment about source quality used to sit. What’s been left in place of all that professional mediation is a search bar and the assumption that you’ll figure it out. - https://cardcatalogforlife.substack.com/i/188856309/the-skil...
An unfortunate conclusion that smuggles in unwarranted good-old-days nostalgia to an otherwise excellent overview. The previous system that they're describing had serious problems, limited access to raw data compared to now, and could not have scaled up to the level of access to information that the internet provides.
The information environment prior to the early 2000s was quite terrible. We shouldn't pretend this was a golden age of truth-oriented gatekeeping, although there were certainly gatekeepers. There were a lot of misconceptions, errors, and unchecked biases on dead trees and in late 90s databases. The idea that those librarians, researchers, editors, fact-checkers were aligned with anything you might care about is also unsupported and dubious.
Wikipedia is a godsend.
I’ve been pissed off with Google for (10+?) years now, ever since it became apparent to me that they changed their search from returning what you queried to some kind of fuzzy guess at what they think you’re looking for (probably based on what average, ie, non technical, people look for).
Possibly that verbatim option puts it back to what used to work pretty well for me, but because they changed it without really saying and then made the option for the old behaviour hidden away with an obtuse name, I had no idea about it until reading this article and had largely written them off as being more interested in showing adverts than what I was actually looking for.
Once I discovered that ChatGPT and similar are almost always way better at finding what I was actually looking for than Google ever was, Google is now very far from my first choice of search service.
It also helps that LLMs tend to be very good at helping you find the correct term, project, technology name, etc, for something when you’re not sure up front of what term to search for exactly.
This take is so tiring to read on HN. GOOG won the FUD WAR with Russias misinfo playbook.
Ohh yea. E-a-e-t.
GOOG doesn't track clicks either..........
I realized this when I was curious to know when a TV show’s next season may start and all the search results were useless fluff articles, even though their titles looked promising.
In conjunction with my having concluded some time prior that they had generally switched their search (for example when searching for software development stuff) to seemingly always assume I was actually searching for something else, made me convinced that Google had become quite useless.
I found that all of them really suck nowadays. AI also hallucinates and lies to me, which means they waste my time. Wikipedia is still ok but the AI Skynet crap is constantly attacking it, trying to erode its quality.
For example, you can use Sparql to perform structured queries on Wikidata (a structured database version of Wikipedia) to get well beyond unstructured documents.
Here's every person in Wikibase that was born in NYC: https://query.wikidata.org/#%23Humans%20born%20in%20New%20Yo...